ao link
Twitter
Linked In
Bluesky
Threads
Twitter
Linked In
Bluesky
Threads

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Six in 10 MPs say housing associations need more funding

Six in 10 MPs agree that social housing providers need more funding from the government, a new poll has found.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Houses of Parliament
Nine in ten Labour MPs said housing associations needed more funding (picture: Paddy Kumar/Unsplash)
Sharelines

Six in 10 MPs say housing associations need more funding #UKhousing

Six in 10 MPs agree that social housing providers need more funding from the government, a new poll has found #UKhousing

A study of 2,226 people across the UK also found that over half of voters (53%) were more likely to vote for a political party that committed to more funding for social and affordable housing.

In the poll of MPs, conducted by Savanta and commissioned by housing association Hyde, three-quarters (76%) felt their party’s plans for future provision of social and affordable housing are not as clear as they need them to be as they enter a general election year.

At the same time, almost two-thirds of MPs agreed that social housing providers needed more financial support from the government to improve homes and services for residents.


READ MORE

The enduring economic case for Build SocialThe enduring economic case for Build Social
Return to inflation-linked social rent hikes necessary for landlord investment, CIH saysReturn to inflation-linked social rent hikes necessary for landlord investment, CIH says
What will social housing providers need to address in 2024?What will social housing providers need to address in 2024?

This rises to nearly nine in 10 Labour MPs who said housing associations needed more funding, compared with two in five Conservative MPs.

Returning to the public, support for investment in social housing was higher among younger voters, with 48% of voters aged over 55 in favour, rising to 52% of 35 to 54-year-olds and 61% of 18 to 34-year-olds.

Half of white voters were more likely to back a party that invests more in social housing, while 64% of Asian voters and 71% of Black voters would do so.

Two in five of 18 to 34-year-olds said they had postponed life decisions, such as starting a family, because of uncertainty around where they would live.

Across all age groups, a quarter of people in England said they had delayed a life decision because of housing uncertainty. This increased to two in five people in London.

When extrapolated across the population of England, the 25% equated to 14.1 million people putting their lives on hold due to inadequate housing, and more than 4.7 million adults under 35.

Hyde said political parties should commit to investing in social rented homes, a long-term rent settlement for housing associations and funding to accompany the Decent Homes Standard, which the government is currently reviewing.

According to YouGov, housing is now the fourth most significant issue for British people and the fastest growing major issue Britain faces.

Andy Hulme, chief executive of Hyde, said the main political parties “have to start listening”.

He said: “Not only is setting out a clear plan to build more and invest in affordable and social housing the right thing to do, but this polling shows it’s a vote winner, too.

“We need to be building around 90,000 more socially rented homes every year to meet existing need. But to get anywhere near this, we need more public investment, which will give the sector confidence and unlock an even larger amount of private investment.”

Sign up for our development and finance newsletter

A block of flats under construction
Picture: Alamy
Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.