You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles
On a second day of evidence, Joanne Smith gives an account of the chaotic scenes within the control centre as the fire developed.
Key points
A picture emerged today of the frantic scenes inside London Fire Brigade’s back-up control room as the horrors of the Grenfell Tower fire unfolded in the early hours of Wednesday 14 June last year.
Joanne Smith, senior operations manager at the force, spent a second day facing intensive questioning from Richard Millett, chief counsel to the inquiry.
Ms Smith yesterday detailed how the nerve-centre taking 999 calls and mobilising firefighters had been moved from its usual Merton base to a smaller site in Stratford, east London, due to routine security upgrades.
Today she was asked to go over the tragic night in forensic detail and forced to defend decisions made by call handlers as the desperate situation began to overwhelm efforts to contain it.
Arriving at the control room at about 2.15am Ms Smith said she made the decision within 15 minutes to tell call handlers to advise people to leave the building rather than stay and await rescue.
She said learnings from the 2009 Lakanal House disaster had influenced her decision along with a range of other factors.
Ms Smith said that given the scenes in the control room, as staff grappled to get on top of the situation that was rapidly unfolding, she didn’t question why a decision to tell people to evacuate hadn’t been taken earlier.
“The control operators were taking constant calls, many of them harrowing and distressing… it was very noisy in the control room, there was a down link from the police helicopter so that was additional noise… there was the whiteboard set-up and that rhythm of communication had started. I wouldn’t imagine anyone could have stepped back and have an oversight as they were all very task-orientated.
I was the only spare person who arrived… I could have logged on to a position and got involved with taking calls but I made a conscious decision not to,” she said.
Ms Smith was asked to look at the transcript of a 999 call made about an hour before she took the decision to tell operators to advise callers to leave the building.
The emergency call in question came at 1.30am from the 22nd floor of Grenfell Tower. According to the transcript, the caller described some smoke and asked whether they should stay in the flat and the operator replied: “I obviously can’t really advise you but I’ll let the firemen know you’re there.”
Ms Smith was pressed on whether the operator had asked the right questions and given the correct responses.
“The operator still believes the fire is on the fourth floor,” she said. “The caller is on the 22nd floor… we let the firefighters on scene know there were people on the 22nd floor… had the call progressed and become a fire survival guidance call, I would have expected the operator to assess the situation and provide advice.”
The operator did not offer fire survival guidance – or assess whether it was required – it was likely to be due to the sheer scale of the unfolding tragedy, Ms Smith said.
“There was a huge volume of calls coming in, we were handling over 100 in that hour from people in the tower wanting advice and I imagine the operators were trying to get to everyone as quickly as possible…. I can only imagine the situation.”
Ms Smith went on to describe the way information was collated from 999 callers and passed to firefighter crews on the ground via “scraps of paper”, a hastily repurposed whiteboard, radio messages, a computerised log and constant mobile phone calls.
Ms Smith defended the rapidly created system.
“Stratford is a smaller location than Merton – you are able to have visible eyesight with everyone and hear conversations,” she insisted
Closing statements
Day 85: victims' lawyers attack the fire brigade
Further expert evidence
Including some additional evidence from emergency call handlers, bereaved and relatives
Day 84: further evidence from survivors and relatives
Day 83: swift evacuation of tower possible if residents alerted
Day 82: initial fire was extinguished but then returned to the flat
Day 81: overheating fridge-freezer most likely cause of fire
Day 80: fire doors installed did not match product tested
Day 79: resident advised to stay put despite fire in flat
Day 78: insulation and cladding material below required standard
Day 77: molten plastic spread blaze down tower
Day 76: 'stay put' should be dropped when fire spreads across floors
Other witness evidence
Police, ambulance, gas suppliers, council, TMO and call room operators give evidence
Day 75: call room operators give evidence
Day 74: further evidence from TMO officers
Day 73: TMO boss failed to pass information to firefighters
Day 72: fire finally extinguished when gas switched off
Day 71: further questions over stay put advice
Day 70: the police evidence
The bereaved, survivors and relatives’ evidence
Day 69: video shows smoke billowing through fire door
Day 68: KCTMO removed self closing mechanism and never replaced it
Day 67: gaps in cladding fixed with duct tape
Day 66: 'don't fix broken system with a sticking plaster'
Day 65: survivor dragged disabled man down nine floors to safety
Day 64: KCTMO 'did not replace broken fire door'
Day 63: foam insulation inside cladding 'exposed' says survivor
Day 62: father gives harrowing account of son's death
Day 61: council’s management organisation slammed for faulty electrics
Day 60: stay put advice ‘led to deaths’, residents say
Day 59: residents describe problems with new windows
Day 58: survivor describes how daughter saved his life
Day 57: firefighter evidence ‘a slap in the face’, says survivor
Day 56: relations with contractor were ‘toxic’
Day 55: resident 'never happy' with stay-put advice
Day 54: tenant gives evidence about housing association
Day 53: stay put advice 'felt like trap'
Day 52: resident saved by son's phone call
The firefighters’ evidence
Day 51: firefighter feared encouraging residents to jump
Day 50: the LFB commissioner
Day 49: fire chief reveals frustration over lack of building plans
Day 48: internal fire spread 'bigger story' than cladding
Day 47: fire officer considered evacuating crews over building collapse fears
Day 46: 'we were improvising' senior firefighter admits
Day 45: firefighter urged for abandonment of 'stay put' policy
Day 44: firefighter recalls radio signal difficulties
Day 43: call hander 'uncomfortable' with insisting residents stay put
Day 42: residents only told to leave if they called fire brigade back
Day 41: breathing equipment delay 'hampered rescues on upper floors'
Day 40: chiefs told firefighters to abandon policy
Day 39: firefighters reveal dramatic rescue of children
Day 38: firefighters issue aplogies to families
Day 37: council 'unable to provide tower plans'
Day 36: QC defends inquiry process
Day 35: Javid would welcome interim recommendations
Day 34: water from hose 'too weak' to reach the flames
Day 33: 'oh my god, we've been telling people to stay put'
Day 32: further fire fighter describes lack of equipment and low water pressure
Day 31: 'incredibly difficult' task of recording information outlined
Day 30: struggle to maintain control over rescue operation described
Day 29: fire service 'overwhelmed' by survival guidance calls
Day 28: 'the building beat us'
Day 27: firefighters 'forced to abandon plans to reach roof'
Day 26: poor signage hindered rescue efforts
Day 25: water pressure left firefighting equipment 'like garden hose'
Day 24: decision to abandon 'stay put' explored
Day 23: TV images 'could have assissted' rescue effort
Day 22: description of hectic scenes in the control centre
Day 21: account from the fire service 'nerve centre'
Day 20: firefighter describes 'huge volume' of calls from trapped residents
Day 19: firefighter 'given no training on cladding fires'
Day 18: evacuation would have been 'huge catastrophe'
Day 17: firefighters describe access and lift issues
Day 16: scenes of carnage likened to 9/11
Day 15: firefighters recount trauma of survival guidance calls
Day 14: firefighters describe spread of blaze
Day 13: firefighters recall radio difficulties
Day 12: "it was like a war zone"
Day 11: questions raised over fire fighters' radios
Day 10: watch manager emotional under questioning
Day nine: lead firefighter 'not trained in stay put policy'
The expert reports: authors give evidence to inquiry
Day eight: where the fire started
Day seven: what was in the cladding?
Day six: the cause and spread of the fire
Day five: expert highlights key issues
Day four: firefighters defend response to fire
Day three: council and contractors appear for the first time
Day two: lawyers for the survivors make their case
Day one: expert evidence released on cladding and stay put
The commemoration hearings
30 May: Grenfell Council 'recognised it should not house disabled victim above four storeys'
29 May: Anger on day six of the Grenfell Inquiry
25 May: Grenfell families 'forced to live in chimney with stay put policy'
24 May: Grenfell family complained about father being housed on 17th floor
23 May: Tributes to children on third day of Grenfell hearings
22 May: Emotions run high as Grenfell bereaved shown footage of the tower burning
21 May: Grenfell victims share tributes as inquiry opens
In the days following the Grenfell Tower fire on 14 June 2017, Inside Housing launched the Never Again campaign to call for immediate action to implement the learning from the Lakanal House fire, and a commitment to act – without delay – on learning from the Grenfell Tower tragedy as it becomes available.
One year on, we have extended the campaign asks in the light of information that has emerged since.
Here are our updated asks:
GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LANDLORDS