Gove accepts ‘faulty’ government guidance contributed to Grenfell fire

The admission comes as Mr Gove prepares to set out plans to ban developers from building new homes if they do not sign contracts to repair dangerous blocks they built. 

Those who refuse to sign face a ban on receiving planning permission or building control approval, which will effectively stop them building new homes, he told The Sunday Times. 

“Those who haven’t [signed] will face consequences. They will not be able to build new homes,” Mr Gove told the paper. 

Before Grenfell, official rules contained in Approved Document B – government-published guidance on fire safety – said the external surfaces of walls needed to reach a standard called ‘Class 0’. 

This standard allowed materials that could prove violently combustible in a real-world fire – such as the aluminium composite material cladding used on Grenfell Tower – to pass. 

The Grenfell Tower Inquiry has shown that ministers were repeatedly warned that this standard was too low from the 1990s onwards, but never removed it from guidance. 

In particular, the government did not act after a 2013 inquest into the six deaths in a fire at south London’s Lakanal House resulted in a recommendation for a review of the guidance “with particular regard” to the issue of external fire spread.

A special-interest group of MPs wrote to ministers 21 times between 2014 and 2017 asking for the Class 0 standard to be removed, but they were repeatedly rebuffed, with ministers refusing to meet them to discuss their concerns. 

Civil servants who worked in the department during this period have pointed to the focus on deregulation as a major reason for the disinterest in updating the guidance. 

But after the fire, the government wrote to building owners to say that the Class 0 standard only applied to the surface of a composite panel, and that its core was required to be the much higher standard of ‘limited combustibility’.

Civil servant Brian Martin, who had personally missed several key opportunities to revise the guidance, helped to draft this letter. 

When he gave evidence to the inquiry, he was asked whether it was “a planned, deliberate and underhanded attempt by you and those around you to rewrite history in the light of the 71 deaths at Grenfell [on the night] in order to protect the government’s position after the event”, which he denied.

The government, however, stuck to the interpretation of building guidance contained in this letter for years.

In autumn 2018, it published an advice note which claimed that any use of combustible materials on tall buildings without a large-scale test was a breach of the rules.

This resulted in thousands of flats becoming unmortgageable, and was the start of a crisis in lending which continues today and has trapped tens of thousands of people in unsaleable properties as they wait for surveys and repair work. 

In the Sunday Times interview, Mr Gove also said he wanted to ban leasehold as a form of property ownership. “I don’t believe leasehold is fair in any way. It is an outdated feudal system that needs to go. And we need to move to a better system and to liberate people from it,” he said.

Leasehold sees flat dwellers purchase a long lease on their property from a freeholder who owns the property and charges ‘ground rents’ to make a return, often for an investment fund.

It has long been subject to criticism that it is riddled with hidden costs and leaves residents unable to control the service charges in their buildings.