You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles
The flammable foam inside the cladding on Grenfell Tower was left exposed when it was installed, the inquiry heard today.
Today’s inquiry saw a large number of witness statements from residents, survivors and the bereaved uploaded to the inquiry’s website.
Among these was the statement of Roy Smith, who lived in flat 95 on the 12th floor of Grenfell Tower.
He revealed in his statement that cladding installed as part of the refurbishment of the tower completed left highly flammable foam exposed.
He said: “Once they had fitted the cladding, the gaps in the cladding were obvious. From the inside of the flat it was possible to put your hand out of the window, to reach into the cladding and touch the foam inside the metal outer – the edges weren’t sealed.”
In her expert report to the inquiry, Dr Barbara Lane found that the flammable core of the cladding was the main cause of the fire spreading up the side of the building. Mr Smith was likely referring to the Celotex polyisocyanurate foam insulation, which was also combustible and identified as a major cause of the fire’s spread.
Mr Smith also discussed the installation of the heating system in his evidence to the inquiry.
He said that during the refurbishment of the tower that finished in 2016, Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation agreed not to install a boiler by the entrance to the flat after he complained repeatedly.
The refurbishment, which was led by contractor Rydon, involved the installation of new boilers in every flat in the tower. Most of these were installed by the front doors of the flats.
Inside Housing has previously reported that in order to install the new heating system, contractors removed safeguards known as fire stopping in the floors of every flat and planned to replace them.
According to Mr Smith, Claire Williams from the management organisation asked him not to tell any other residents that the boiler’s location had been changed. Mr Smith, however, did tell his neighbours as he was concerned that “siting a boiler in the hall was a safety risk”.
He also revealed that when Rydon installed a new fire door, its self-closing mechanism broke “shortly” after it was installed.
Mr Smith added that the council had threatened to evict him after he tried to prevent workers from Rydon from working on his windows, as he was concerned about “the poor standard of their workmanship”.
Another survivor, Sawsan Choucair, also submitted her witness statement to the inquiry, in which she revealed that her mother, her sister, her sister’s husband and their three children all died in the fire.
Her brother, Nabil Choucair, did not live in the tower but said he had spent the night there with his sister Nadia – who died in the fire – on 12 June.
Mr Choucair said that he was supposed to have gone back on 14 June “but this was never to be”.
It was at 2.40am, he said, when Sawsan rang him to tell him there was a fire. He turned the TV on and saw the blaze. After failing to get through to his sister on the phone, he rushed to Grenfell Tower with his brother, Hisam.
He recalls: “Our plan was to go in and rescue them. I think this would have been around 3.15am – 3.40am. It was total chaos and pandemonium. The fire brigade were everywhere and kept coming in, everything was cordoned off and the police were shouting at everyone.
“When I tried to get round them they threatened me with arrest. We just wanted to get in and save them. At the time, it felt that we got so close but in hindsight we must have been about 100 metres away. Nevertheless, you could see the fire and you could feel the heat.”
Closing statements
Day 85: victims' lawyers attack the fire brigade
Further expert evidence
Including some additional evidence from emergency call handlers, bereaved and relatives
Day 84: further evidence from survivors and relatives
Day 83: swift evacuation of tower possible if residents alerted
Day 82: initial fire was extinguished but then returned to the flat
Day 81: overheating fridge-freezer most likely cause of fire
Day 80: fire doors installed did not match product tested
Day 79: resident advised to stay put despite fire in flat
Day 78: insulation and cladding material below required standard
Day 77: molten plastic spread blaze down tower
Day 76: 'stay put' should be dropped when fire spreads across floors
Other witness evidence
Police, ambulance, gas suppliers, council, TMO and call room operators give evidence
Day 75: call room operators give evidence
Day 74: further evidence from TMO officers
Day 73: TMO boss failed to pass information to firefighters
Day 72: fire finally extinguished when gas switched off
Day 71: further questions over stay put advice
Day 70: the police evidence
The bereaved, survivors and relatives’ evidence
Day 69: video shows smoke billowing through fire door
Day 68: KCTMO removed self closing mechanism and never replaced it
Day 67: gaps in cladding fixed with duct tape
Day 66: 'don't fix broken system with a sticking plaster'
Day 65: survivor dragged disabled man down nine floors to safety
Day 64: KCTMO 'did not replace broken fire door'
Day 63: foam insulation inside cladding 'exposed' says survivor
Day 62: father gives harrowing account of son's death
Day 61: council’s management organisation slammed for faulty electrics
Day 60: stay put advice ‘led to deaths’, residents say
Day 59: residents describe problems with new windows
Day 58: survivor describes how daughter saved his life
Day 57: firefighter evidence ‘a slap in the face’, says survivor
Day 56: relations with contractor were ‘toxic’
Day 55: resident 'never happy' with stay-put advice
Day 54: tenant gives evidence about housing association
Day 53: stay put advice 'felt like trap'
Day 52: resident saved by son's phone call
The firefighters’ evidence
Day 51: firefighter feared encouraging residents to jump
Day 50: the LFB commissioner
Day 49: fire chief reveals frustration over lack of building plans
Day 48: internal fire spread 'bigger story' than cladding
Day 47: fire officer considered evacuating crews over building collapse fears
Day 46: 'we were improvising' senior firefighter admits
Day 45: firefighter urged for abandonment of 'stay put' policy
Day 44: firefighter recalls radio signal difficulties
Day 43: call hander 'uncomfortable' with insisting residents stay put
Day 42: residents only told to leave if they called fire brigade back
Day 41: breathing equipment delay 'hampered rescues on upper floors'
Day 40: chiefs told firefighters to abandon policy
Day 39: firefighters reveal dramatic rescue of children
Day 38: firefighters issue aplogies to families
Day 37: council 'unable to provide tower plans'
Day 36: QC defends inquiry process
Day 35: Javid would welcome interim recommendations
Day 34: water from hose 'too weak' to reach the flames
Day 33: 'oh my god, we've been telling people to stay put'
Day 32: further fire fighter describes lack of equipment and low water pressure
Day 31: 'incredibly difficult' task of recording information outlined
Day 30: struggle to maintain control over rescue operation described
Day 29: fire service 'overwhelmed' by survival guidance calls
Day 28: 'the building beat us'
Day 27: firefighters 'forced to abandon plans to reach roof'
Day 26: poor signage hindered rescue efforts
Day 25: water pressure left firefighting equipment 'like garden hose'
Day 24: decision to abandon 'stay put' explored
Day 23: TV images 'could have assissted' rescue effort
Day 22: description of hectic scenes in the control centre
Day 21: account from the fire service 'nerve centre'
Day 20: firefighter describes 'huge volume' of calls from trapped residents
Day 19: firefighter 'given no training on cladding fires'
Day 18: evacuation would have been 'huge catastrophe'
Day 17: firefighters describe access and lift issues
Day 16: scenes of carnage likened to 9/11
Day 15: firefighters recount trauma of survival guidance calls
Day 14: firefighters describe spread of blaze
Day 13: firefighters recall radio difficulties
Day 12: "it was like a war zone"
Day 11: questions raised over fire fighters' radios
Day 10: watch manager emotional under questioning
Day nine: lead firefighter 'not trained in stay put policy'
The expert reports: authors give evidence to inquiry
Day eight: where the fire started
Day seven: what was in the cladding?
Day six: the cause and spread of the fire
Day five: expert highlights key issues
Day four: firefighters defend response to fire
Day three: council and contractors appear for the first time
Day two: lawyers for the survivors make their case
Day one: expert evidence released on cladding and stay put
The commemoration hearings
30 May: Grenfell Council 'recognised it should not house disabled victim above four storeys'
29 May: Anger on day six of the Grenfell Inquiry
25 May: Grenfell families 'forced to live in chimney with stay put policy'
24 May: Grenfell family complained about father being housed on 17th floor
23 May: Tributes to children on third day of Grenfell hearings
22 May: Emotions run high as Grenfell bereaved shown footage of the tower burning
21 May: Grenfell victims share tributes as inquiry opens