New manifesto calls for all buildings to have remediation plans by June 2024

“A case-by-case approach is unsustainable for dealing with the magnitude of affected buildings under 11 metres in height. 

“Where professional risk assessments call for remediation or mitigation measures, then action to make the building safe must follow, regardless of building height. 

“The government should work with all stakeholders to ensure their view of risk in buildings under 11 metres is not contradicted by the approach taken by lenders, insurers, fire engineers and building owners,” according to the manifesto. 

The group said the scope of government grant funding schemes must be widened to “ensure buildings can be made fully safe”, including remediation of non-cladding defects, and they should also cover mitigation measures such as sprinklers wherever these are recommended by holistic risk assessments. 

“In simple terms: funding should match the risk,” it said.

The group said that all leaseholders must be protected from all costs related to the building safety crisis. 

“There should be no ‘non-qualifying’ leases, and all multi-occupancy residential buildings should qualify for the leaseholder protections,” it said.

“No leaseholder should pay a penny to remediate building safety defects, the cap should be zero (£0). If the government maintains that leaseholders should shoulder any costs, it should be transparent by reporting how many leaseholders are paying and how much,” it said.

All financial losses should be covered by the Building Safety Act’s ‘leaseholder protections’, according to the manifesto. 

“All buildings must have a remediation plan in place by June 2024 and there must be clear deadlines for completion of remediation work,” the group said. 

To speed up remediation, the group said the government should consider using compulsory purchase order (CPO) powers to step in and take direct ownership of the freehold of any building where the owner is failing to undertake remedial works by a given deadline.

The group also called for “robust oversight” of the developer self-remediation contracts with “deadlines to ensure our homes are made safe at pace and that the scope of work is not reduced to prioritise their profits over our safety – leaving leaseholders liable for the remaining defects”. 

The manifesto said: “Since we launched our campaign in 2019, the government has announced £5.1bn of funding through the ACM Cladding Remediation Fund, Building Safety Fund (BSF) and the Cladding Safety Scheme (CSS) – although only a quarter of this has been spent since the BSF launched three years ago. 

“This funding will also largely be offset by a tax on development and the income HM Treasury will gain from an estimated £15-20bn of remediation projects across 10,000+ buildings, through VAT and other taxes. 

“Government funding is also focused only on cladding remediation – but buildings cannot be made half-safe. The building safety crisis goes far beyond external cladding and so must funding solutions.

“In 2023, 50 developers signed contracts to self-remediate ‘life-critical’ fire safety defects in buildings they developed or refurbished over a 30-year period. 

“This is a step forward, but it only represents an estimated 10-15% of all defective buildings. 

“It is down to pure luck whether you bought a home developed by an SME developer that has not yet been asked to self-remediate their buildings, or one that chose to dissolve immediately after construction – which has happened all too frequently. 

“We want to see consistent policy to protect leaseholders from costs, not a game of chance.”

The campaign group launched its new manifesto around a week after a lawyer told delegates at a conference that he felt the “tidal wave” of building safety legislation has been “slightly mismanaged” by the government.