ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Three upgrades and one downgrade in latest batch of RSH judgements

The Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) has upgraded three housing associations for financial viability and downgraded one in its latest round of regulatory judgements.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Office building with Gateway sign on the outside
Gateway Housing Association was upgraded from V2 to V1 for financial viability (picture: Google Street View)
Sharelines

The Regulator of Social Housing has upgraded three housing associations for viability and downgraded one in its latest round of regulatory judgements #UKhousing

The latest ratings are among 61 regulatory judgements published by the English regulator today, with the majority relating to annual stability checks.

Black Country Housing Group (BCHG), Gateway Housing Association and One Vision Housing went from V2 to V1, the top grade for financial viability, while all three retained their G1 grades for governance.

Teign Housing was downgraded from V1 to V2. 

BCHG’s previous judgement noted that development plans and additional costs relating to investment in existing homes would reduce headroom against lender covenant requirements.

The RSH concluded that delivery of that investment, alongside economic uncertainty in relation to wider inflation and interest rate risks, reduced the landlord’s capacity to deal with adverse events.

However, according to the latest judgement, BCHG’s board took the decision to reprofile its development programme, which has reduced future debt requirement.

“Together with changes to bring assumptions in line with agreed rent increases this means that there is additional capacity in BCHG’s financial plan and increased headroom against lender covenant requirements,” the regulator concluded.


READ MORE

Five landlords retain top grades in latest RSH judgementsFive landlords retain top grades in latest RSH judgements
Governance downgrades for two landlords in latest batch of regulatory judgementsGovernance downgrades for two landlords in latest batch of regulatory judgements
Six downgrades and two upgrades in latest round of regulatory judgementsSix downgrades and two upgrades in latest round of regulatory judgements

The RSH’s previous judgement for Gateway noted that increasing planned investment in existing homes, including in fire and building safety and energy-efficiency work, “had a detrimental impact on interest cover”.

As a result, that potential further spending on energy-efficiency works and economic uncertainty reduced Gateway’s capacity to deal with adverse scenarios.

But this latest judgement concluded that Gateway’s forecast interest cover profile has now strengthened, informed by recent stock-condition surveys and the clarification of liabilities for required fire and building safety work.

“This increases Gateway’s capacity to deal with adverse scenarios,” the regulator said.

In its previous judgement for One Vision, the RSH said the landlord’s development plans and additional costs relating to its repairs and maintenance programme would impact negatively on its interest cover position.

It said that this, alongside the wider economic uncertainty, reduced the housing association’s capacity to deal with adverse events.

However, One Vision has since completed its fire safety programme, as well as improved its asset costing and lifecycle information.

“As a result, [it] has increased financial capacity and is able to deal with a wide range of adverse scenarios,” the regulator said.

Teign was downgraded from V1 to V2 for viability, while it retained its top grade of G1 for governance.

According to the judgement, the regulator has assurance that Teign continues to comply with the financial viability elements of the Governance and Financial Viability Standard and that its financial plans are consistent with and support its financial strategy.

The RSH said the landlord has an “adequately funded business plan, sufficient security and is forecast to continue to meet its financial covenants”. 

However, Teign is increasing investment in its existing homes and will continue to do so informed by stock surveys, which is weakening its interest cover. This, coupled with wider economic pressures including inflation, reduces Teign’s capacity to deal with adverse scenarios, the regulator concluded. 

Following its first assessment, the regulator gave three for-profit subsidiaries of Sage Investments – Sage Housing, Sage Homes and Sage Rented – grades of G1 and V2. 

According to the three judgements, the subsidiaries’ current acquisition strategy is focused on the purchase of newly developed homes. During this period of growth, they are forecasting a weaker financial profile, the regulator said. 

Lincolnshire Housing Partnership retained its G1/V2 grades.  

Jo Reece, chief executive of Teign, said: “We recognise this as a reasonable assessment. The tough current economic climate means that, along with many other providers, our increasing investment in existing homes has impacted our interest cover. 

“However, as the report states, we have an adequately funded business plan, sufficient security and are forecast to continue to meet our financial covenants.

“We are pleased to remain compliant and are committed to delivering the ongoing planned investment in our homes and services.”

Alison Thain, chair of Sage Homes, said: “We would like to thank the regulator who has worked closely and collaboratively with us over an extended period to understand our business and the work that we are doing to deliver for our customers.

“Our G1/V2 rating underlines our position as an ambitious registered provider that is delivering large numbers of new homes for those that need them the most.

“This is reflected in Sage Homes being named the largest provider of newly built affordable homes in England for the third successive year.

“We are therefore extremely proud that the regulator has recognised the commitment of our boards, investors and our people to our long-term strategy and vision.”

Of the dozens of other landlords named in this round of judgements, they all retained their existing grades.

Sign up for our regulation and legal newsletter

Sign up for our regulation and legal newsletter
Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings