ao link
Twitter
Linked In
Bluesky
Threads
Twitter
Linked In
Bluesky
Threads

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Industry bodies raise concern over direction of Hackitt Review

Industry bodies have expressed concern that calls for prescriptive building regulations to ensure the safety of high rises after the Grenfell Tower fire are being ignored by the government’s independent review.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Dame Judith Hackitt, picture: Tom Pilston/Eyevine
Dame Judith Hackitt, picture: Tom Pilston/Eyevine
Sharelines

Experts call for prescriptive building regulations #ukhousing

Dame Judith Hackitt is carrying out a review of building regulations for the government, with the aim of improving fire safety standards. She set out an interim report in December and is expected to publish her full report in May.

But she has so far been reluctant to recommend a move towards ‘prescriptive’ regulation, which would set clear standards for fire safety.

A spokesperson for the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) said it is “essential” that there are “baseline prescriptive requirements in relation to matters such as use of combustible materials, means of escape and sprinkler systems”.

The membership organisation has not been given a place on the Hackitt Review’s working group into building regulations despite requesting input.


READ MORE

BRE accused of ‘conflict of interest’ over Hackitt Review roleBRE accused of ‘conflict of interest’ over Hackitt Review role
Committee chair: combustible materials on tower blocks ‘cannot be right’Committee chair: combustible materials on tower blocks ‘cannot be right’
Construction materials industry body to chair working group on building regulationsConstruction materials industry body to chair working group on building regulations
Dame Judith Hackitt: building regulations ‘not fit for purpose’Dame Judith Hackitt: building regulations ‘not fit for purpose’
Orr: sector must move away from a ‘compliance state of mind’Orr: sector must move away from a ‘compliance state of mind’

The RIBA spokesperson added: “We are not aware of any successful building control system internationally that does not have a significant prescriptive element. We are concerned that our viewpoint is absent from this group.”

Sarah Kostense-Winterton, executive director of the Mineral Wool Insulation Manufacturers Association (MIMA), told a recent House of Lords fire safety event that successful building regulations need to have “no wiggle room; they are prescriptive”.

She added: “The classification needs to be straightforward and simple. People need to understand what is in their buildings. Public safety is number one and we need to bring clarity to this area.”

Brian Robinson, president of the Fire Sector Federation, told the same event: “If that review includes ‘get-out clauses’ [in the regulations it recommends] then that won’t be fine. Because if there is a way in which you can reduce that standard artificially and purport to meet the standard then that’s not really very good at all.”

The Communities and Local Government (CLG) Committee has raised concerns about the direction of the Hackitt Review so far and has called for the review to look at more prescriptive building regulations.

Clive Betts, chair of the CLG Committee, told Inside Housing the committee had asked questions about banning combustible materials – saying they “shouldn’t be put on tower blocks full stop” – and why Dame Judith had not considered banning them as an “interim measure”.

He added: “It seems to me that you don’t put things that burn on buildings that are many hundreds of metres up in the sky; it just seems to be instinctively wrong.”

Mr Betts wrote to Dame Judith in January to express his concern that a “risk-based system” of building regulations “might leave the regulations too open to interpretation by an industry that you have already concluded requires a significant change in culture”.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has been contacted for comment.

The Hackitt Review

The Hackitt Review

Photo: Tom Pilston/Eyevine

Dame Judith Hackitt’s (above) interim report on building safety, released in December 2017, was scathing about some of the industry’s practices.

Although the full report is not due to be published until later this year, the former Health and Safety Executive chair has already highlighted a culture of cost-cutting and is likely to call for a radical overhaul of current regulations in an interim report.

Dame Hackitt’s key recommendations and conclusions include:

  • A call for the simplification of building regulations and guidelines to prevent misapplication
  • Clarification of roles and responsibilities in the construction industry
  • Giving those who commission, design and construct buildings primary responsibility that they are fit for purpose
  • Greater scope for residents to raise concerns
  • A formal accreditation system for anyone involved in fire prevention on high-rise blocks
  • A stronger enforcement regime backed up with powerful sanctions

FULL LIST: HACKITT REVIEW WORKING GROUPS

Working group 1: Golden Thread

Chairs:

Ben Stayte and Hannah Brook

Members:

National Fire Chiefs Council

Local Authority Building Control

Construction Products Association

UIL

National Housing Federation

Health and Safety Executive

Institution of Fire Engineers

 

Working group 2: Regulations and Guidance

Chair:

Peter Caplehorn, Construction Products Association

Members:

National Fire Chiefs Council

Local Authority Building Council

Fire Industry Association

Building Research Establishment

Health and Safety Executive

Build UK

Chartered Institute of Building Services Engineers

 

Other groups

Working Group 1: Construction and Design

Chair:

Rachel White, Institute for Civil Engineers

Members:

Association of Consultant Approved Inspectors

Build UK

Local Authority Building Control

National Fire Chiefs Council

Institution of Fire Engineers

Royal Institute of British Architects

Health and Safety Executive

Construction Leadership Council

National House Building Council

Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors

 

Working Group 2: Procurement

Chair:

Paul Nash, Chartered Institute of Building

Members:

Telford Homes

Kier Living

Construction Industry Council

Local Government Association

Home Builders Federation

 

Working Group 2: Occupation and Maintenance

Chair:

Nick Coombe, National Fire Chiefs Council

Members:

Association of Residential Managing Agents

National Fire Chiefs Council

British Institute of Facilities Management

Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors

Health and Safety Executive

Leasehold Advisory Service

Local Government Association

Association of British Insurers

 

Working Group 4: Competence

Chair:

Graham Watts, Construction Industry Council

Members:

Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors

Construction Industry Council Approved Inspector Register

Engineering Council

Fire Industry Association

Local Authority Building Control

Royal Institute of British Architects

National Fire Chiefs Council

Fire Protection Association

University of Edinburgh, School of Engineering

Institution of Fire Engineers

 

Working Group 5: Residents’ Voice

Chair:

Darren Hartley, TAROE

Members

Association of Residential Managing Agents

British Property Federation

Camden Leaseholders’ Forum, nominated by LEASE

Confederation of Co-operative Housing

Fire Industry Association

National Federation of Tenant Management Organisations

Optivo Homes, nominated by National Housing Federation

Shelter

Tenant Participation Advisory Service

 

Working Group 6: Quality Assurance and Products

Chair:

Dr Debbie Smith, Building Research Establishment

Members

Construction Products Association

British Standards Institution

United Kingdom Accreditation Service

British Board of Agrement

Fire Protection Association

Fire Industry Association

Centre for Fire and Hazards Science, University of Central Lancashire

National Fire Chiefs Council

Institution of Fire Engineers

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.