You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles
Fire service control room officers who took 999 calls from people trapped in Grenfell Tower gave evidence to the public inquiry into the disaster yesterday.
Five witnesses appeared before the inquiry yesterday, from London Fire Brigade (LFB), Kent Fire and Rescue Service, Surrey Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) and Essex County Fire and Rescue Service (ECFRS).
They outlined their training, roles and actions on 14 June 2017.
Sarah Russell, a control room officer at LFB who completed her probation shortly before the Grenfell fire, detailed receiving calls from people in the tower at the brigade’s Stratford control room.
She said that between 1am and 5am, the control room was “inundated” with calls about the fire.
The inquiry heard how Ms Russell spent an hour on the phone to a “very scared” 12-year-old girl, named as Jessica, who said she was trapped on the 22nd floor of Grenfell Tower having tried to leave several times.
In a written statement, Ms Russell said: “All I could do was offer support, to keep asking questions in the hope that her situation might improve, tell her the fire engines were there, fighting the fire and try and prevent panic.
“After about an hour I could not get any more response from her — only rasping sounds, then nothing.
“I stayed on the line a little while longer with my hand hovered over the call termination button. I was torn as what best to do. I eventually ended the call when the line fell silent.”
She said that she had “felt helpless” while talking to the girl and that the calls were “relentless” for four hours.
But she said things fell “eerily quiet” after 5am, by which time her team was “completely drained and very upset”.
Zoe Martin, a watch manager in Kent on the night of the fire, told the inquiry how she had taken a call from the wife of a man trapped in a flat in Grenfell.
Upon calling the man, she said in her written statement, “I asked him whether he could get out and all I could hear were groans”.
She added: “I tried several times to get something out of him but I simply could not and eventually it sounded as through the phone had been dropped. It was a very difficult call to take.”
Rob Brown, a crew commander at SFRS, told the inquiry that he supervised a colleague while she took calls from the daughter-in-law of a man trapped in flat 194, on the 22nd floor of Grenfell Tower.
He said he decided to pass the details on to LFB rather than call the man from SFRS as “[c]alling the number and giving advice could muddle up any rescue operations that were in place by the crews on the fire ground”.
He said that afterwards “my mind was racing thinking over the calls we received and whether we did the right thing”.
Half an hour after the woman’s first call, she called again to say her father-in-law could see flames and smoke – but that he had mobility issues so could not leave.
At 3.11am, LFB asked Mr Brown to contact neighbouring fire services to relay advice to give to people trapped in Grenfell Tower about trying to escape.
The inquiry also heard from Nigel Dilley, a group manager at ECFRS, and Sharon Lancaster, a control room operator at ECFRS at the time of the fire.
Mr Dilley was in charge of “inter-agency liaison”, and described having difficulties contacting LFB control on the night.
Ms Lancaster told the inquiry how she was called by a woman trapped on the 22nd floor describing smoke in her flat. She said she tried to pass this information on to LFB but “could not get through to London at all. They were not answering the phones.”
The hearing continues.
Closing statements
Day 85: victims' lawyers attack the fire brigade
Further expert evidence
Including some additional evidence from emergency call handlers, bereaved and relatives
Day 84: further evidence from survivors and relatives
Day 83: swift evacuation of tower possible if residents alerted
Day 82: initial fire was extinguished but then returned to the flat
Day 81: overheating fridge-freezer most likely cause of fire
Day 80: fire doors installed did not match product tested
Day 79: resident advised to stay put despite fire in flat
Day 78: insulation and cladding material below required standard
Day 77: molten plastic spread blaze down tower
Day 76: 'stay put' should be dropped when fire spreads across floors
Other witness evidence
Police, ambulance, gas suppliers, council, TMO and call room operators give evidence
Day 75: call room operators give evidence
Day 74: further evidence from TMO officers
Day 73: TMO boss failed to pass information to firefighters
Day 72: fire finally extinguished when gas switched off
Day 71: further questions over stay put advice
Day 70: the police evidence
The bereaved, survivors and relatives’ evidence
Day 69: video shows smoke billowing through fire door
Day 68: KCTMO removed self closing mechanism and never replaced it
Day 67: gaps in cladding fixed with duct tape
Day 66: 'don't fix broken system with a sticking plaster'
Day 65: survivor dragged disabled man down nine floors to safety
Day 64: KCTMO 'did not replace broken fire door'
Day 63: foam insulation inside cladding 'exposed' says survivor
Day 62: father gives harrowing account of son's death
Day 61: council’s management organisation slammed for faulty electrics
Day 60: stay put advice ‘led to deaths’, residents say
Day 59: residents describe problems with new windows
Day 58: survivor describes how daughter saved his life
Day 57: firefighter evidence ‘a slap in the face’, says survivor
Day 56: relations with contractor were ‘toxic’
Day 55: resident 'never happy' with stay-put advice
Day 54: tenant gives evidence about housing association
Day 53: stay put advice 'felt like trap'
Day 52: resident saved by son's phone call
The firefighters’ evidence
Day 51: firefighter feared encouraging residents to jump
Day 50: the LFB commissioner
Day 49: fire chief reveals frustration over lack of building plans
Day 48: internal fire spread 'bigger story' than cladding
Day 47: fire officer considered evacuating crews over building collapse fears
Day 46: 'we were improvising' senior firefighter admits
Day 45: firefighter urged for abandonment of 'stay put' policy
Day 44: firefighter recalls radio signal difficulties
Day 43: call hander 'uncomfortable' with insisting residents stay put
Day 42: residents only told to leave if they called fire brigade back
Day 41: breathing equipment delay 'hampered rescues on upper floors'
Day 40: chiefs told firefighters to abandon policy
Day 39: firefighters reveal dramatic rescue of children
Day 38: firefighters issue aplogies to families
Day 37: council 'unable to provide tower plans'
Day 36: QC defends inquiry process
Day 35: Javid would welcome interim recommendations
Day 34: water from hose 'too weak' to reach the flames
Day 33: 'oh my god, we've been telling people to stay put'
Day 32: further fire fighter describes lack of equipment and low water pressure
Day 31: 'incredibly difficult' task of recording information outlined
Day 30: struggle to maintain control over rescue operation described
Day 29: fire service 'overwhelmed' by survival guidance calls
Day 28: 'the building beat us'
Day 27: firefighters 'forced to abandon plans to reach roof'
Day 26: poor signage hindered rescue efforts
Day 25: water pressure left firefighting equipment 'like garden hose'
Day 24: decision to abandon 'stay put' explored
Day 23: TV images 'could have assissted' rescue effort
Day 22: description of hectic scenes in the control centre
Day 21: account from the fire service 'nerve centre'
Day 20: firefighter describes 'huge volume' of calls from trapped residents
Day 19: firefighter 'given no training on cladding fires'
Day 18: evacuation would have been 'huge catastrophe'
Day 17: firefighters describe access and lift issues
Day 16: scenes of carnage likened to 9/11
Day 15: firefighters recount trauma of survival guidance calls
Day 14: firefighters describe spread of blaze
Day 13: firefighters recall radio difficulties
Day 12: "it was like a war zone"
Day 11: questions raised over fire fighters' radios
Day 10: watch manager emotional under questioning
Day nine: lead firefighter 'not trained in stay put policy'
The expert reports: authors give evidence to inquiry
Day eight: where the fire started
Day seven: what was in the cladding?
Day six: the cause and spread of the fire
Day five: expert highlights key issues
Day four: firefighters defend response to fire
Day three: council and contractors appear for the first time
Day two: lawyers for the survivors make their case
Day one: expert evidence released on cladding and stay put
The commemoration hearings
30 May: Grenfell Council 'recognised it should not house disabled victim above four storeys'
29 May: Anger on day six of the Grenfell Inquiry
25 May: Grenfell families 'forced to live in chimney with stay put policy'
24 May: Grenfell family complained about father being housed on 17th floor
23 May: Tributes to children on third day of Grenfell hearings
22 May: Emotions run high as Grenfell bereaved shown footage of the tower burning
21 May: Grenfell victims share tributes as inquiry opens