ao link
Twitter
Linked In
Bluesky
Threads
Twitter
Linked In
Bluesky
Threads

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Grenfell Inquiry day 57: firefighter evidence ‘a slap in the face’, says survivor

A survivor of the Grenfell Tower fire has hit back at the London Fire Brigade (LFB) commissioner’s suggestion that she would change nothing about the service’s response on the night of the blaze.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Holborn Bars, where the Grenfell Tower Inquiry is being held (picture: Getty)
Holborn Bars, where the Grenfell Tower Inquiry is being held (picture: Getty)
Sharelines

Grenfell Inquiry day 57: firefighter evidence “a slap in the face”, says survivor #ukhousing

Key points

  • Resident of Grenfell Tower calls remarks by Dany Cotton, LFB commissioner, “a slap in the face”
  • Rosemary Oyewole was about to attempt escape through the window when firefighters arrived at her flat
  • Firefighters asked her to allow neighbours to take refuge in her flat, who were never rescued and died there
  • Ms Oyewole also described issues between residents and Rydon during the tower’s refurbishment works

READ MORE

Dame Judith Hackitt calls for ‘root-and-branch review’ in construction after GrenfellDame Judith Hackitt calls for ‘root-and-branch review’ in construction after Grenfell
London housing association ‘should have fixed’ Grenfell fire door, inquiry hearsLondon housing association ‘should have fixed’ Grenfell fire door, inquiry hears
Ten charged after fraud team investigation into Grenfell fire alarms firmTen charged after fraud team investigation into Grenfell fire alarms firm

Day 57

Appearing before the public inquiry into the disaster, Rosemary Oyewole said Dany Cotton’s claim – which she made during a hearing in September – was “a slap in the face”.

The secondary school science teacher, who lived on the 14th floor of the tower with her young daughter and her fiancé, Seun, described the family’s terrifying escape from the tower through “acrid black smoke” and “relentless and unstoppable heat” in the early hours of the morning.

She told the inquiry they had repeatedly been told to stay in their flat and were preparing to try and escape through the window using a makeshift rope made from sheets when firefighters ran into her flat appearing “panicked and worried” and told them to leave.

And she said that at one point firefighters told her that her flat “was the safest on the floor because the other half of the building was on fire”, requesting that some neighbours be brought in to take refuge there.

Zainab Deen, her son Jeremiah, Denis Murphy and brothers Mohammad and Omar Alhajali were in Ms Oyewole’s flat when she left.

However, only Omar managed to escape the fire, while the others perished.

In her written statement to the inquiry, Ms Oyewole said: “I do not know why those people left in our flat did not follow us out. I do not know why they were not made to leave by the firefighters.

“It is a thought, a question, and a guilty feeling that will stay with me for the rest of my life. As we were the first out of the flat, I simply assumed that they would follow us out.

“Now I know that they did not, I will be asking myself the question why they died in my flat for the rest of my life.”

In her concluding remarks to the hearing today, she said: “I would also like to say that for anyone to say they do not regret what happened or would not change anything about what happened on that night – I know for a fact I wasn’t to blame, but I would definitely change certain things about that night if I could.

“I think it’s quite a slap in the face for anyone to say they wouldn’t change anything about what happened that night or they have no regrets about what happened that night.

“We lost beautiful, beautiful, beautiful people that night – innocent children, everyone that passed away that night was innocent and nobody deserved that – and if events had played out different then I might not be sitting here myself.”

She added: “The firemen that came back that night – on many occasions people came back – had many chances to see how many people were brought into our flat.

“People had the chance to see the state of the people that were brought into our flats, and for there not to be any precautions taken into place and the right equipment to come and get people out of our flat, I think if they did have the correct equipment I personally think that the people that passed away in our flat possibly wouldn’t have passed away.”

Ms Oyewole also detailed “issues with the way that Rydon staff would treat and speak to residents when they raised a query or a complaint”.

Rydon was the main contractor on the extensive 2016 refurbishment of Grenfell Tower.

Ms Oyewole said she had tried to resist plans to move the boiler in her flat from the kitchen to beside the front door for fear it could be a safety hazard.

However, she said she “relented” after receiving “threats” from Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation that resisting the change would constitute a tenancy breach.

In the afternoon, Richard Millett QC read into the record witness statements from other people directly affected by the fire, which are available on the inquiry website.

The inquiry continues.

The Grenfell Tower Inquiry

The Grenfell Tower Inquiry

Closing statements

 

Day 85: victims' lawyers attack the fire brigade

 

Further expert evidence

Including some additional evidence from emergency call handlers, bereaved and relatives

 

Day 84: further evidence from survivors and relatives

Day 83: swift evacuation of tower possible if residents alerted

Day 82: initial fire was extinguished but then returned to the flat

Day 81: overheating fridge-freezer most likely cause of fire

Day 80: fire doors installed did not match product tested

Day 79: resident advised to stay put despite fire in flat

Day 78: insulation and cladding material below required standard

Day 77: molten plastic spread blaze down tower

Day 76: 'stay put' should be dropped when fire spreads across floors

 

Other witness evidence

Police, ambulance, gas suppliers, council, TMO and call room operators give evidence

 

Day 75: call room operators give evidence

Day 74: further evidence from TMO officers

Day 73: TMO boss failed to pass information to firefighters

Day 72: fire finally extinguished when gas switched off

Day 71: further questions over stay put advice

Day 70: the police evidence

 

The bereaved, survivors and relatives’ evidence

 

Day 69: video shows smoke billowing through fire door

Day 68: KCTMO removed self closing mechanism and never replaced it

Day 67: gaps in cladding fixed with duct tape

Day 66: 'don't fix broken system with a sticking plaster'

Day 65: survivor dragged disabled man down nine floors to safety

Day 64: KCTMO 'did not replace broken fire door'

Day 63: foam insulation inside cladding 'exposed' says survivor

Day 62: father gives harrowing account of son's death

Day 61: council’s management organisation slammed for faulty electrics

Day 60: stay put advice ‘led to deaths’, residents say

Day 59: residents describe problems with new windows

Day 58: survivor describes how daughter saved his life

Day 57: firefighter evidence ‘a slap in the face’, says survivor

Day 56: relations with contractor were ‘toxic’

Day 55: resident 'never happy' with stay-put advice

Day 54: tenant gives evidence about housing association

Day 53: stay put advice 'felt like trap'

Day 52: resident saved by son's phone call

 

The firefighters’ evidence

 

Day 51: firefighter feared encouraging residents to jump

Day 50: the LFB commissioner

Day 49: fire chief reveals frustration over lack of building plans

Day 48: internal fire spread 'bigger story' than cladding

Day 47: fire officer considered evacuating crews over building collapse fears

Day 46: 'we were improvising' senior firefighter admits

Day 45: firefighter urged for abandonment of 'stay put' policy

Day 44: firefighter recalls radio signal difficulties

Day 43: call hander 'uncomfortable' with insisting residents stay put

Day 42: residents only told to leave if they called fire brigade back

Day 41: breathing equipment delay 'hampered rescues on upper floors'

Day 40: chiefs told firefighters to abandon policy

Day 39: firefighters reveal dramatic rescue of children

Day 38: firefighters issue aplogies to families

Day 37: council 'unable to provide tower plans'

Day 36: QC defends inquiry process

Day 35: Javid would welcome interim recommendations

Day 34: water from hose 'too weak' to reach the flames

Day 33: 'oh my god, we've been telling people to stay put'

Day 32: further fire fighter describes lack of equipment and low water pressure

Day 31: 'incredibly difficult' task of recording information outlined

Day 30: struggle to maintain control over rescue operation described

Day 29: fire service 'overwhelmed' by survival guidance calls

Day 28: 'the building beat us'

Day 27: firefighters 'forced to abandon plans to reach roof'

Day 26: poor signage hindered rescue efforts

Day 25: water pressure left firefighting equipment 'like garden hose'

Day 24: decision to abandon 'stay put' explored

Day 23: TV images 'could have assissted' rescue effort

Day 22: description of hectic scenes in the control centre

Day 21: account from the fire service 'nerve centre'

Day 20: firefighter describes 'huge volume' of calls from trapped residents

Day 19: firefighter 'given no training on cladding fires'

Day 18: evacuation would have been 'huge catastrophe'

Day 17: firefighters describe access and lift issues

Day 16: scenes of carnage likened to 9/11

Day 15: firefighters recount trauma of survival guidance calls

Day 14: firefighters describe spread of blaze

Day 13: firefighters recall radio difficulties

Day 12: "it was like a war zone"

Day 11: questions raised over fire fighters' radios

Day 10: watch manager emotional under questioning

Day nine: lead firefighter 'not trained in stay put policy'

 

The expert reports: authors give evidence to inquiry

 

Day eight: where the fire started

Day seven: what was in the cladding?

Day six: the cause and spread of the fire

Day five: expert highlights key issues

Day four: firefighters defend response to fire

Day three: council and contractors appear for the first time

Day two: lawyers for the survivors make their case

Day one: expert evidence released on cladding and stay put

 

The commemoration hearings

 

30 May: Grenfell Council 'recognised it should not house disabled victim above four storeys'

29 May: Anger on day six of the Grenfell Inquiry

25 May: Grenfell families 'forced to live in chimney with stay put policy'

24 May: Grenfell family complained about father being housed on 17th floor

23 May: Tributes to children on third day of Grenfell hearings

22 May: Emotions run high as Grenfell bereaved shown footage of the tower burning

21 May: Grenfell victims share tributes as inquiry opens

 

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.