ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

The road to decarbonising doesn’t have to be a steep one

Making the necessary changes to stock can be a gradual process that fits into existing planned preventative maintenance (PPM) schedules, writes Greig Fenton, regional director at property consultancy Thomas & Adamson

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Sharelines

Making the necessary changes to stock can be a gradual process that fits into existing planned preventative maintenance schedules, writes Greig Fenton, regional director at property consultancy Thomas & Adamson #UKhousing

The journey to net zero can seem a large, ominous and expensive undertaking for housing providers. Housing associations in England own about 2.9 million homes, with another 528,000 across the devolved nations, so it is certainly true that there is a lot of work ahead to reduce housing’s contribution to the UK’s overall carbon emissions.

While it is a challenge many countries face, it is a particularly acute issue in the UK. According to the Home Builders Federation, we have the oldest stock in Europe – 78% of homes were built before 1980 and 38% prior to 1946, compared with an average of 61% and 18%, respectively, on the continent.


READ MORE

CPD module: how to approach decarbonisation policy and strategiesCPD module: how to approach decarbonisation policy and strategies
Social Housing Decarbonisation Fund: how is the roll-out going?Social Housing Decarbonisation Fund: how is the roll-out going?
Why a more considered approach is key to decarbonising housing in the UKWhy a more considered approach is key to decarbonising housing in the UK

Inevitably, this affects the condition many of them are in. Government figures show that 15% of homes in England failed to meet the Decent Homes Standard in 2022 – the highest proportion of substandard homes in Europe.

Research from Rightmove found that more than half of the UK’s housing stock has an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) rating of Band D or below.

That may paint a daunting picture, but it’s important to remember that this doesn’t all need to be tackled immediately and at once. In England, social housing must reach an EPC rating of C or above by 2030, and net zero by 2050, while the Energy Efficiency Standard for Social Housing (EESSH) in Scotland set out milestones that include all social housing meeting EPC B by the end of December 2032.

Those deadlines may not be too far away, but local authorities and housing associations still have time to make the necessary changes to their stock. It can be a gradual process that fits into existing PPM schedules, which most, if not all, housing organisations should be undertaking – even if they are not using that exact term.

“Even understanding what archetypes of properties you have, and the carbon footprint associated with each of them, is a good starting point”

For anyone unfamiliar with a PPM, it is essentially a 20 to 25-year strategy for regular scheduled inspections, services and cyclical repairs to housing stock (or any other type of property, for that matter). It should be a live and organic document that sets out how different elements of a building will be maintained, with work undertaken every three to five years.

To implement a PPM, the very first thing you need to do is understand your estate through an initial data capture exercise. You need to find out how much stock you are dealing with, what the different property types are, their current EPC ratings and other energy-efficiency attributes, as well as what maintenance has already taken place.

For owners of a large number of assets, that in itself may seem like an insurmountable task – but not everything will need to be surveyed to the nth degree. Even understanding what archetypes of properties you have, and the carbon footprint associated with each of them, is a good starting point.

From there, you can extrapolate the potential costs and timeframes involved with refurbishing each property type, beginning to programme a route map. By setting out the routine maintenance you already have planned, it will allow you to overlay any renovation and improvement works.

So, for example, if windows and doors are due to be replaced in some homes in five years’ time, you could plan to upgrade these to a higher standard rather than replace like with like. This will remove any potential duplication of replacements and improvements, and give you a more gradual spending profile over the course of your PPM.

“A lot of housing providers we speak to say they feel overwhelmed by the task ahead to reach net zero”

Such an approach will also show you where there could be low-hanging fruit to pick – for example, homes with cavity walls may suit the installation of cavity wall insulation. Other buildings may simply require external insulation to be installed, which can be easily included in the programme.

Alternatively, the most problematic homes may need to be prioritised from a resource and time perspective, depending on their condition. Much older stock – especially homes built prior to the 1960s – will probably need to be assessed from a cost-benefit perspective to see whether improvements are going to be worthwhile.

In cases where buildings do not have historic status, a feasibility study may reasonably conclude that the costs involved mean it would be better to demolish the property and rebuild a more energy-efficient alternative on the site.

A lot of housing providers we speak to say they feel overwhelmed by the task ahead to reach net zero. There are a lot of moving parts and to deliver what is needed will require a variety of departments within housing associations – including estates, projects and finance – to align with one another.

But it is a journey that should be taken through a variety of steps rather than one giant leap. Weaving those through your existing maintenance plans is a solid foundation for spreading the cost of reaching net zero over time, decarbonising your housing stock as efficiently as possible.

Greig Fenton, regional director, Thomas & Adamson

Sign up for our asset management newsletter

Sign up for our asset management newsletter
Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings